Urface layer at altitudes of 55 m, an intermediate layer at altitudes from 15 m to 150 m, and From 23:00 until 24:00, the power within the reduced layer was transferred inside the eastsouth a layer of enhanced turbulence above. The irregular behavior on the kinetic power flux ern path. Above this layer, inside the layer of enhanced turbulence, the character of en vector in the near-surface layer is explained by the impact of your Glycodeoxycholic Acid-d4 Biological Activity underlying surface. In ergy transfer changed radically, the kinetic power flux density increased sharply, and the the intermediate layer whose altitude zturb very first enhanced from 25 m at 01:00 to 100 m at path of energy transfer fluctuated resulting from a higher contribution of the turbulent ki 03:00, the energy transfer within the north-western path prevailed. From 05:00 till 15:00, the power of power transfer changed to south-western flux simultaneous improve netic directioncomponent. The maximum kinetic power with densities have been observed at of zturb to 150 m. Then, from 15:00 till 18:00, the direction of power transfer remained 18:00, when the kinetic power was predominantly transferred within the southwestern direc unchanged, but the lower boundary from the layer of enhanced turbulence zturb decreased to tion. From Figure 3 it could be observed that the altitude variety z zturb plus the time period from one hundred m. From 19:00 till 22:00, the path of energy transfer changed to north-western, 06:00 till 18:00 are most dangerous for UAV Flavonol web flights [2]. The wind effect on highrise build and zturb decreased to 75 m. ings becomes most pronounced from 08:00 till 18:00, when the maximum values on the From 23:00 till 24:00, the power within the lower layer was transferred in the eastsouthern direction. Above this layer, in the layer of enhanced turbulence, the character of energy transfer changed radically, the kinetic energy flux density improved sharply, plus the direction of energy transfer fluctuated resulting from a greater contribution with the turbulent kinetic power component. The maximum kinetic power flux densities were observed at 18:00, when the kinetic power was predominantly transferred in the south-western path. From Figure 3 it can be seen that the altitude range z zturb and also the time period from 06:00 till 18:00 are most risky for UAV flights [2]. The wind effect on high-rise buildings becomes most pronounced from 08:00 till 18:00, when the maximum values with the Umov vector had been observed for z zturb [3]. Meanwhile, these higher values with the Umov vectors are promising for the wind energy possible of wind turbines straight proportional towards the typical kinetic energy flux density [4,5,17,18].Atmosphere 2021, 12,ten of5. Conclusions Primarily based on post-processing from the information of minisodar measurement, a novel system of investigating the spatiotemporal dynamics of your kinetic power flux density vector–the Umov vector–has been proposed and successfully realized. The diurnal hourly behavior on the vertical profiles on the mean and turbulent kinetic power components and the wind velocity vector field in the decrease 200-m layer of the atmosphere were analyzed with each other using the ratio on the turbulent to mean kinetic power components. At night and morning hours (00:004:00), (z) was inside the range 0.0100; within the evening, the span of its values enhanced to 0.01000, and after that given that 23:00, it decreased once again to 0.0100. Within the nearground layer, at altitudes up to 25 m, focus is drawn to sharp changes of the ratio on the.