Y (e.g.,METHODSDuring September 2009 to September 2010, we collected qualitative {data
Y (e.g.,METHODSDuring September 2009 to September 2010, we collected qualitative data via focus groups and person, in-depth interviews performed with MSM and TGW in Lima and Iquitos, Peru, and Guayaquil, Ecuador. We chosen these cities mainly because of their concentrated HIV epidemics: estimated HIV prevalence for Peru was 12.42 amongst MSM, 20.80 amongst TGW,27 and 0.40 inside the common population.28 In Ecuador, the price wasJune 2014, Vol 104, No. 6 | American Journal of Public Cucurbitacin I HealthGalea et al. | Peer Reviewed | Study and PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20068289 Practice | eRESEARCH AND PRACTICEopen with family and friends), men who did not recognize as gay, and men who have been sex workers. We chose these 3 groups as well as TGW to make sure inclusion of a variety of sorts of RM users and have been guided by our preceding research studying the acceptability of preexposure prophylaxis30 and male circumcision33 inside the same cities. Simply because participants could belong to more than 1 in the four recruitment groups (e.g., a gay man who also sold sex), they have been asked to choose the group with which they most identified. We chose 2 data collection procedures to balance the breadth of suggestions and opinions afforded by focus groups using the extra indepth and often individual data yielded by individual interviews. We made use of practically identical semistructured interview guides for the concentrate groups and interviews (Table 1). We started the concentrate groups and interviews by asking participants what they knew about RMs, before offering any explanation. Subsequent, wetold participants that RMs were “substances–for instance, gels, creams, lubricants or liquids–that could possibly be inserted rectally ahead of obtaining anal sex so that you can lower the possibility of becoming infected with HIV.” We asked participants to discuss their views of RMs at the same time as their perceptions in the opinions of their peers. The focus groups and interviews lasted approximately 60 minutes. We collected sociodemographic facts at the end with the sessions with a self-administered questionnaire.Data AnalysisWe digitally recorded the concentrate groups and interviews, transcribed them verbatim, and analyzed them with ATLAS.ti version six.0 (ATLAS.ti Scientific Computer software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany). We made use of framework analysis,34 reading each and every transcript in its entirety, reading it a second time, and assigning representative codes to emergent themes as we detected them. While we determined somecodes a priori in accordance with the predefined inquiries, we designed other codes de novo as new themes emerged. We reread text passages many times and refined coding through the iterative analytic course of action. We extracted text by culling all passages together with the same code across the entire information set, formatting them into tables, then translating them into English. 1 investigator study the extracted, translated text and independently verified the codes. We discussed discrepancies and resolved them by mutual agreement. We combined really equivalent and overlapping codes into single codes and grouped households of codes by thematic likeness. Finally, we chose certain quotations to illustrate the emergent themes.RESULTSSociodemographic traits are listed in Table two. We carried out 1 concentrate group perTABLE 1–Guide for Focus Groups and In-Depth Interviews Amongst Peruvian and Ecuadorian Guys Who’ve Sex With Guys and Transgender Females Concerning Rectal Microbicides: 2009Domain Knowledge Questions What have you heard about rectal microbicides (or microbicides in general) What do you know abo.