Pectively (see Figure 6). The arrival occasions in minutes distribution in 40), arc (j,c) are extended to the maximum in the time window to minimize at each and every node are: resulting = that the cars did The resulting speeds for the recomthe travel speed, j1 = 139, j2 in75, j3 = 123, and j4 = 78. not considerably exceed the course of action of distribution limits (see Table extended to the maximum of your time window to reduce mended speed in the arc (j,c) are 4). 14 of the travel speed, resulting in that the automobiles did not considerably exceed the recom 21 mended speed limits (see Table four).Figure five. Pareto frontier for the first scenario. Figure 5. Pareto frontier for the very first scenario. Figure five. Pareto frontier for the very first situation.Figure 6. Outcomes obtained within the initially situation. Figure 6. Results obtained in the first scenario. Table Benefits obtained in the time, trip assignment, and travel speed for arc (j,c). Figure 6. 4. First situation: arrival initial scenario. Variables ac Tgc bc Wjckr Vv jck Point of Sales 1 41 71 71 13 59 2 82 112 112 11 62.33 three 89 119 119 10 65.83 4 68 98 98 16 20 68.five 55.67 five 53 83 83 18 69.5 6 96 126 126 15 65 7 74 104 104 9 57.22 8 79 109 109 19 57.78 9 119 149 149 17 62.33 10 87 117 117 12 50.4.2. Evaluation from the Second Phenmedipham In stock scenario For this initially situation, the Pareto front is presented in Figure 7. The minimum price was obtained with all the weights = 0.45 and = 0.45. The initial objective resulted inside a expense of 12,215.5, though for the second objective it was 0 simply because no time windows had been violated in any from the nodes. The opening coordinates of each transshipment centers are (28, 70), (25, 40), (24, 40), (14, 70), (51, 40), and (52, 40), AMG-458 Formula respectively (see Figure 8). The4.2. Analysis with the Second Scenario For this 1st situation, the Pareto front is presented in Figure 7. The minimum expense was obtained together with the weights = 0.45 and = 0.45. The first objective resulted in a expense of 12,215.five, though for the second objective it was 0 since no time windows have been vio 21 15 of lated in any on the nodes. The opening coordinates of every single transshipment centers are (28, 70), (25, 40), (24, 40), (14, 70), (51, 40), and (52, 40), respectively (see Figure 8). The arrival occasions in minutes at every single node are: j1 = 150, j2 = 140, j3 = 127, j4 = 128, j5 = 147, and arrival times in minutes at every single the are: j1 = speeds 140, j3 = 127, j4 = 128, j5 = 147, and j6=117. Just as within the very first scenario,noderesulting 150, j2 =for the method of distribution in thej6 = (j,c) are extended to thescenario, the resulting window towards the procedure of travel speed in arc 117. Just as in the initial maximum with the time speeds for reduce the distribution the arc 5). (see Table(j,c) are extended towards the maximum in the time window to reduce the travel speed (see Table 5).Axioms 2021, ten,Axioms 2021, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW17 ofFigure 7. Pareto frontier the second situation. Figure 7. Pareto frontier for for the second situation.Figure eight. Outcomes obtained inside the second situation. Figure 8. Final results obtained inside the second situation. Table 5. SecondSecond scenario: arrival time, trip assignment, and speed for the for the arc (j,c). Table five. situation: arrival time, trip assignment, and travel travel speed arc (j,c). Variables ac Tgc bc Wjckr Vv jck1 82 112 112 28 59.1 four 2 94 64 82 116 94 124 94 112 124 146 124 94 112 1242VariablesPoint of Sales of Sales Point 5 3 6 4 95 7 6 87 37 4964 116 4937 33 63 33 7994 146 7967 63 93 63 67 7994 146 7967 63 93 63 67 9 26 18 29 19 30.